<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Organic/Mechanic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.organicmechanic.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.organicmechanic.org</link>
	<description>Since 2002, Organic/Mechanic has been the personal website of Cleveland, Ohio based web designer, Adam Harvey.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:27:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Bằc — Restaurant Review by Laura Chryst</title>
		<link>http://www.organicmechanic.org/2010/02/b%e1%ba%afc-restaurant-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5907</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Chryst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicmechanic.org/?p=2200#comment-5907</guid>
		<description>Hi - that was a very nice and well written review.  I have not been yet but am looking forward to what sounds like a great dining experience.  I would like to clarify one mistake you have in your review.  It is in reference to the assumption that Bac himself chose the decor and created the atmosphere.  You may be unaware of this but, Bac has a partner whose family did much of the interior work.  While Bac&#039;s family is solely responsible for the kitchen, my good friend Karen Privitera  did most, if not all, of the interior design.  Her brother, Mike, did most of the labor, including building the beautifully well crafted bar. (while I haven&#039;t been to Bac since it opened, I did visit several times during the construction process just to see how things were coming together).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi — that was a very nice and well written review.  I have not been yet but am looking forward to what sounds like a great dining experience.  I would like to clarify one mistake you have in your review.  It is in reference to the assumption that Bac himself chose the decor and created the atmosphere.  You may be unaware of this but, Bac has a partner whose family did much of the interior work.  While Bac’s family is solely responsible for the kitchen, my good friend Karen Privitera  did most, if not all, of the interior design.  Her brother, Mike, did most of the labor, including building the beautifully well crafted bar. (while I haven’t been to Bac since it opened, I did visit several times during the construction process just to see how things were coming together).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bằc — Restaurant Review by Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.organicmechanic.org/2010/02/b%e1%ba%afc-restaurant-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5906</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicmechanic.org/?p=2200#comment-5906</guid>
		<description>To correct a false assumption-- Bac is not the person responsible for the interior design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To correct a false assumption– Bac is not the person responsible for the interior design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bằc — Restaurant Review by Tim Russo</title>
		<link>http://www.organicmechanic.org/2010/02/b%e1%ba%afc-restaurant-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5899</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Russo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicmechanic.org/?p=2200#comment-5899</guid>
		<description>agreed on all counts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed on all counts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gill Sans Fatigue by Debbie</title>
		<link>http://www.organicmechanic.org/2010/02/gill-sans-fatigue/comment-page-1/#comment-5882</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicmechanic.org/?p=2190#comment-5882</guid>
		<description>hmmm, I&#039;m pretty tired of hearing the word &#039;crazy&#039; in song lyrics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm, I’m pretty tired of hearing the word ‘crazy’ in song lyrics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gill Sans Fatigue by Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.organicmechanic.org/2010/02/gill-sans-fatigue/comment-page-1/#comment-5880</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicmechanic.org/?p=2190#comment-5880</guid>
		<description>Also, it is on all of the banners @ Home Depot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, it is on all of the banners @ Home Depot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gill Sans Fatigue by andy</title>
		<link>http://www.organicmechanic.org/2010/02/gill-sans-fatigue/comment-page-1/#comment-5879</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicmechanic.org/?p=2190#comment-5879</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t know Eric Gill was a perv.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn’t know Eric Gill was a perv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mathlete by Meagan</title>
		<link>http://www.organicmechanic.org/2010/01/mathlete/comment-page-1/#comment-5873</link>
		<dc:creator>Meagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicmechanic.org/?p=2183#comment-5873</guid>
		<description>Good luck! I&#039;ve always hated stats... wrong kind of math brain. There&#039;s a part of me that gets stuck- when a question asks what are the chances of a 6 sided di (die?) landing on 4 I KNOW the answer is supposed to be 1 in 6. I WANT to answer: either 100% or 0%. Like Schrodinger&#039;s di or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck! I’ve always hated stats… wrong kind of math brain. There’s a part of me that gets stuck– when a question asks what are the chances of a 6 sided di (die?) landing on 4 I KNOW the answer is supposed to be 1 in 6. I WANT to answer: either 100% or 0%. Like Schrodinger’s di or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mathlete by Tim Russo</title>
		<link>http://www.organicmechanic.org/2010/01/mathlete/comment-page-1/#comment-5872</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Russo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicmechanic.org/?p=2183#comment-5872</guid>
		<description>the horror.  my math muscles were in atrophy the day i was born.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the horror.  my math muscles were in atrophy the day i was born.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Play Double Bid Euchre Part I: Basic Gameplay by dave</title>
		<link>http://www.organicmechanic.org/2004/03/how-to-play-double-bid-euchre-part-i-basic-gameplay/comment-page-1/#comment-5869</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicmechanic.org/ /2004/03/how-to-play-double-bid-euchre-part-i-basic-gameplay/#comment-5869</guid>
		<description>by &#039;calls out&#039; do you mean leads ? I can&#039;t think of any instances where you would not play your worst (ie an ace in low no trump) when your partner already has the trick. In high and low no trump especially there is a concept of the &#039;stopper&#039;. Many times the bidder has one big suit, say 6 or more of a suit beginning with, say, 9/9/10 in low. They hope to play thethe 9/9/10 to clear out the other low cards, then play all their higher ones. If you have say A/A/K/10 you can stop them at 3 tricks by playing the higher cards first, saving your 10. Also, if you are the person with that bid, it is wise to have stoppers in the other suits, so even if you get &#039;stopped&#039; in your main suit you can get back to it. Or pray that your partner saved his &#039;stoppers&#039;. One way to do this is when you are out of the suit played, discard cards in the suit(s) where you have no potential stoppers, and save all the cards in the suit (like that A/A/K/10 .....) for later use. Your partner will appreciate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by ‘calls out’ do you mean leads ? I can’t think of any instances where you would not play your worst (ie an ace in low no trump) when your partner already has the trick. In high and low no trump especially there is a concept of the ‘stopper’. Many times the bidder has one big suit, say 6 or more of a suit beginning with, say, 9/9/10 in low. They hope to play thethe 9/9/10 to clear out the other low cards, then play all their higher ones. If you have say A/A/K/10 you can stop them at 3 tricks by playing the higher cards first, saving your 10. Also, if you are the person with that bid, it is wise to have stoppers in the other suits, so even if you get ‘stopped’ in your main suit you can get back to it. Or pray that your partner saved his ‘stoppers’. One way to do this is when you are out of the suit played, discard cards in the suit(s) where you have no potential stoppers, and save all the cards in the suit (like that A/A/K/10 .….) for later use. Your partner will appreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Infinity Equals Zero by Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.organicmechanic.org/2004/06/infinity-equals-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-5865</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 06:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicmechanic.org/ /2004/06/infinity-equals-zero/#comment-5865</guid>
		<description>After thinking about this concept another idea come to mind. If you take 1 and devide that by 1/2 you get 1/2. If you divide 1 by 1/4 you get 1/4. If the fractions were to keep going allthough you would never get to zero you would have an increacingly large denominator. But getting to zero would be something like tangents in triganometry it would &quot;blow up&quot; hence infinity being zero. You may find fallacies in my thinking but remember im in 8th grade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After thinking about this concept another idea come to mind. If you take 1 and devide that by 1/2 you get 1/2. If you divide 1 by 1/4 you get 1/4. If the fractions were to keep going allthough you would never get to zero you would have an increacingly large denominator. But getting to zero would be something like tangents in triganometry it would “blow up” hence infinity being zero. You may find fallacies in my thinking but remember im in 8th grade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
